Illinois toymaker takes its challenge of Trump administration’s tariffs to Supreme Court

Illinois toymaker takes its challenge of Trump administration’s tariffs to Supreme Court

Illinois toymaker takes its challenge of Trump administration’s tariffs to Supreme Court

CHICAGO — In an airy warehouse in Vernon Hills, Illinois, workers pack educational toys designed to bring children joy and expand their worlds. Plastic apples that can be taken apart to understand fractions, a toy cash register and a kit with a purple stethoscope are stacked on blue metal racks, waiting to be shipped to a budding elementary school CEO or doctor.

The orderly buzz of workers driving forklifts and the routine whirring of a conveyor belt belie the fact that Learning Resources and its sister company, hand2mind, have been in the eye of a storm trying to adapt to tariffs. The companies produce around 50% of their products in China.

When the Trump administration’s tariffs on goods from China shot up in April from around 20% to around 104%, CEO Rick Woldenberg, who has a law degree from the University of Chicago, decided he couldn’t stand by and watch. He hired counsel and sued President Donald Trump’s administration in federal court, saying that the tariffs were unlawful.

In May, the court ruled in favor of Woldenberg, saying that the Trump administration had inappropriately cited the International Economic Emergency Powers Act when imposing the tariffs.

The tariffs stayed in effect while the Trump administration appealed the ruling. Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide the legality of Trump’s tariffs at a hearing Nov. 5, consolidating Woldenberg’s case with lawsuits filed by businesses in other states.

“We believe the tariffs are unlawful. That’s why we went to the Supreme Court,” Woldenberg said. “Rather than reshape our company to suit the needs of politicians … we’re trying to assert our rights as citizens so that we can continue to run our business according to our good judgment.”

Trump has said that his rationale behind tariffs on China was to stimulate domestic manufacturing and create jobs. As of last month, the U.S. economy had 14,000 fewer manufacturing jobs than it did in April, The Associated Press reported. A July analysis by the JPMorganChase Institute found that tariffs would cause around one-third of American companies to collectively incur a direct cost of $82.3 billion, costs that would be managed through price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes or lower profit margins.

Steven Durlauf, an economics professor at the University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy, said American firms typically pass on around 80% of tariff-related costs to consumers. More expensive products reduce sales, leaving firms less likely to invest in domestic production.

“They’re going to have fewer sales and less activity as an organization,” Durlauf said. “In a world like that, you’re less willing to build warehouses and less willing to have new employees involved.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *