Wall Street says it’s time to reset the AI narrative
Two of Wall Street’s biggest firms say the AI boom is far from a speculative mania.
Instead, BlackRock and Bank of America say this cycle is being driven by real corporate investment, earnings, and productivity gains — not the kind of irrational exuberance that defined the dot-com bubble of the early 2000s.
“We don’t think the bubble framing is that useful at this stage for investors,” Jean Boivin, head of the BlackRock Investment Institute, said at a media roundtable on Tuesday.
“We want to avoid just putting everything on a backward-looking kind of metric or assessment,” he continued, noting it’s “incomplete” to describe the AI boom as a bubble given the build-out continues to unfold at an “unprecedented” scale and pace.
Boivin also pointed to the healthy level of skepticism in markets today.
“There is so much talk about the potential of the bubble … people are conscious of the risk,” he said. “It’s when there’s no discussion of that that we should be more worried.”
BlackRock argues the spending boom in AI is so large that it has become the macro story itself, saying the scale of corporate investment could push US GDP growth consistently above the 2% trend that has dominated for decades.
“The capital spending ambitions tied to the AI buildout are so large that the micro is macro,” the firm wrote in its outlook, estimating corporate spending plans between $5 trillion and $8 trillion globally through 2030, most of it in the US.
“The challenge for investors: reconciling huge capital spending plans with the potential AI revenues,” BlackRock added. “Will their orders of magnitude match?”
The firm also flagged the physical limits of the build-out, from compute to the grid, noting AI data centers could consume 15% to 20% of US electricity by the end of the decade. That makes the build-out both transformative and vulnerable: “This frontloading of spending is necessary to realize eventual gains,” BlackRock wrote.
BlackRock said those pressures are part of a structural shift, arguing AI is helping propel stocks to record highs and that it “remains pro-risk and sees the AI theme still the main driver of US equities.”
Bank of America struck a similar tone, but with a more explicit warning about how the next phase of the boom could play out.
“Is this 2000? Are we in a bubble? No,” Savita Subramanian, head of US equity & quantitative strategy, said during BofA’s outlook call on Tuesday. “Will AI continue unfettered in leadership? Also no.”
Subramanian views the current environment as more of a pause than the start of a collapse, describing a potential “air pocket” where capital spending outpaces revenue growth. That lag between investment and monetization, especially around power and infrastructure bottlenecks, could spook investors in the near term.

Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *