India’s DRI Says Smugglers Ditching Hawala Networks for Stablecoins
India’s top anti-smuggling agency has sounded the alarm on the rising use of crypto and stablecoins in drug and gold trafficking, enabling rapid, untraceable international fund transfers that bypass formal financial oversight.
The warning comes from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence’s Smuggling in India Report 2024-25, released Thursday, which points out that digital assets enable “faster and anonymous settlement, minimal oversight, and weak anti-money laundering compliance.”
“Cryptocurrency has emerged as a potent tool for smuggling syndicates due to its decentralised, pseudonymous, and borderless nature,” the report states, noting how digital assets are now widely used to route illicit payments and move crime proceeds, “particularly in narcotics trafficking and gold smuggling cases.”
Among the cases highlighed by the report is a 108-kg transnational gold racket routed through the Indo-China border last July, with over $12.7 million (₹108 crore) in proceeds sent to China via hawala and Tether’s stablecoin USDT after the gold was sold in Delhi.
“The Chinese mastermind used multiple crypto wallets, layering funds for anonymity, and communicated via encrypted Apps like WeChat using VPNs,” the DRI noted. “Forensic analysis of chats, transaction hashes, and wallet IDs corroborated the smuggling trail, marking a significant breakthrough in crypto-hawala detection by DRI.”
“Most jurisdictions globally don’t yet have comprehensive crypto regulations, leading to some regulatory arbitrage and gaps, which are exploited for criminal and illicit activity,” Musheer Ahmed, Founder and MD of Finstep Asia, told Decrypt.
India CBI Busts Transnational Cybercrime Ring, Seizes $327K in Crypto
“Through an active regime, regulators and government bodies will have the ability to only allow compliant operators, implement KYC rules, as well as transaction monitoring, which can help reduce the misuse of virtual assets for illicit activity,” Ahmed said.
He noted it would be prudent for India and similar jurisdictions to consider a “comprehensive regulatory regime, which will not only prevent illicit activity, but also provide higher consumer protection.”
“Blanket bans will not necessarily prevent such activity,” he added, warning that they may push crime further underground and undermine legitimate tokenised-asset use that enables more efficient cross-border commerce.
There is also a need, Ahmed said, for regulators and law enforcement to be “trained in virtual assets activity and transaction tools” so they can act swiftly and effectively when confronting suspicious or illicit crypto activity.

Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *