The winners (and losers) in Trump’s new student loan plans

The winners (and losers) in Trump’s new student loan plans

The winners (and losers) in Trump’s new student loan plans

Forgiveness for some but maybe not for others is what President Donald Trump’s student loan forgiveness plan is amounting to, which is sowing uncertainty for borrowers, experts said.

In a big win for borrowers last month, the Department of Education (ED) agreed with the American Federation of Teachers to process student-loan forgiveness applications for borrowers who reached payment thresholds on an income-contingent repayment (ICR) plan or the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) plan as long as the plans remain in effect. Trump plans to phase out the plans by July 1, 2028. Income-based repayment plans also are eligible for forgiveness.

Celebrations quickly faded when less than two weeks later the department issued a rule critics say would curb Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF). The rule, effective July 1, allows ED to exclude forgiveness for those who work at organizations it believes engage in “criminal activity.”

The rule would allow ED to “target sanctuary jurisdictions, as well as nonprofit organizations providing support to immigrant families, gender-affirming care, diversity and equity in the workplace, and protecting the first amendment rights of protesters,” nonprofit consumer advocacy group Protect Borrowers said in a statement.

PSLF, created in 2007, cancels a borrower’s remaining federal student debt after ten years of repayment for those who work for a “public service” employer, generally defined as government or a non-profit entity. It’s meant to reward people who work for the “public good,” like firefighters, police, public educators, military, and public health workers.

ED said eligibility standards for what constitutes a qualifying public service employer haven’t been adequately monitored. As a result, certain organizations “engaging in illegal activities that harm their communities and the public good” have qualified, it said in a statement.

“Taxpayer funds should never directly or indirectly subsidize illegal activity,” said Under Secretary of Education Nicholas Kent. PSLF “was meant to support Americans who dedicate their careers to public service – not to subsidize organizations that violate the law, whether by harboring illegal immigrants or performing prohibited medical procedures that attempt to transition children away from their biological sex.”

School teacher Kelly Elizabeth Belt fills out paperwork to payback her student loan while trying to navigate policies under the current administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, in Provo, Utah, U.S. May 30, 2025. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart
School teacher Kelly Elizabeth Belt fills out paperwork to payback her student loan while trying to navigate policies under the current administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, in Provo, Utah, U.S. May 30, 2025. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart

PSLF won’t end, but its rules will likely be settled by the courts after a flurry of lawsuits were filed shortly after the ED announcement.

Twenty-one states and the District of Columbia sued the education department over the new rule restricting eligibility for PSLF.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *